What Clients Have Found

The Situation

A Bangkok-based individual needed a power of attorney to authorize a family member to manage property transactions on their behalf during an extended period abroad. A document prepared elsewhere had been rejected at the registry office for failing to meet current format requirements.

What We Did

We reviewed the rejected document to identify the specific deficiencies, then prepared a new version that addressed each point. The client was briefed on the regulatory basis for each required element so they understood the document they were signing.

The Outcome

The document was accepted by the registry office without issue. The client was able to travel as planned, with their affairs properly arranged. The engagement was completed within the standard five-day delivery window.

The Situation

A European brand expanding into Southeast Asia needed to secure trademark registration in Thailand before launching locally. The brand name had some similarity to an existing registration in a different product class, which created uncertainty about whether the application would succeed.

What We Did

We conducted a thorough preliminary search and assessed the risk of conflict with the similar registration. After advising the client that the distinction in product classes was sufficient to proceed, we prepared and submitted the application with supporting documentation that clearly articulated the differentiation.

The Outcome

The application was accepted by the DIP without objection. The brand launched in Thailand with its trademark registration confirmed. The client proceeded to register in two further Southeast Asian jurisdictions based on the same application structure.

The Situation

A Bangkok-based service company was growing rapidly and had reached a size at which its existing contractual arrangements with partners and suppliers no longer reflected the value being exchanged. The management team was uncertain which relationships needed formal revision and what risks were present in the existing structure.

What We Did

Over six fortnightly sessions, we reviewed the key contractual relationships, identified points of exposure, and worked with the management team to prioritize which arrangements required formal revision. We also addressed the compliance obligations that arise at the company's current scale under Thai law.

The Outcome

The company ended the engagement with a clear picture of its legal landscape, three revised supplier agreements, and a compliance checklist specific to its regulatory situation. Management reported that the structured pace of the sessions allowed decisions to be reached thoughtfully rather than reactively.